{"id":2132,"date":"2026-05-27T07:44:03","date_gmt":"2026-05-27T07:44:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tactical-dailynews.com\/?p=2132"},"modified":"2026-05-27T07:44:03","modified_gmt":"2026-05-27T07:44:03","slug":"irons-vs-red-dots-for-carry-pistols-which-is-better","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tactical-dailynews.com\/?p=2132","title":{"rendered":"Irons Vs. Red Dots For Carry Pistols: Which Is Better?"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n

When it comes to carry guns, are red dots really that<\/em> much better than iron sights? I hit the range to find out.<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Just 13 years ago, when I authored the book, Handgun Training for Personal Protection<\/a><\/em>, I included a chapter on red dot sights, where I wrote, \u201cThe future is coming. When it gets here, we will all shoot better and faster.\u201d In some ways, reflex-style red dot sights have come a long way in the past 13 years, and today, many believe a self-defense handgun without one is unsuitable \u2026 or even antiquated. I\u2019ve spent a good part of the past five years becoming proficient with reflex sight-equipped handguns, and I wanted to explore just how much more effective they might make a self-defense pistol.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s a lot to consider when comparing a red dot sight to fixed sights, such as the size they add to a pistol, as well as the red dot sight\u2019s durability and electronic dependency. All those considerations are mute, however, if we cannot\u2014like I predicted 13 years ago\u2014shoot better and faster with them. Most everyone will tell you they feel like they shoot better with a red dot sight\u2014I feel like I am more accurate with one\u2014but are the advantages of a red dot sight a measurable fact for most shooters?<\/p>\n

\"wilson
Even if you perform equally well with a red dot sight, you must weigh the concerns of potential failure that comes with them.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

What I wanted to learn was pretty straightforward: Can a shooter shoot better and faster with a red dot sight?<\/p>\n

A Fair Fight<\/strong><\/h2>\n

To conduct a test like this, some parameters must be established to make it fair. First, all the shooting must be conducted with the same or identical handguns. Second, the shooters cannot be permitted to substantially familiarize themselves with the handgun or sight system before testing. And finally, the shooters should represent a varied skill set comprised of a shooter who predominately uses a red dot sight, a shooter who predominately uses fixed sights, and a shooter who uses both about an equal amount. Each shooter should conduct the same drills with each sight system without more than just a few familiarization shots.<\/p>\n

The Pistol<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The handgun chosen for this test was actually somewhat responsible for the conduct of the experiment. Wilson Combat<\/a> just introduced their eXperior Elite pistol, which is an optics-ready Commander-sized pistol. The optics plate on this pistol is fitted with a fixed rear sight, and when the plate is removed for red dot installation, there are no co-witnessing sights. This meant that a shooter could not cheat during the test because only one sight system would be available at any given time.<\/p>\n

\"wilson\"wilson<\/figure>\n

The Shooters<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Three shooters were chosen based on their preferred or most practiced sight system, but also with the knowledge that they could perform\u2014on demand\u2014each drill to its par time standard, with no misses, using their preferred sights system.<\/p>\n

\"wilson\"wilson<\/figure>\n

Shooter 1 spends about as much time shooting a red dot-sighted pistol as a fixed-sighted pistol. Shooter 2\u2014a police officer\u2014carries a pistol with a red dot sight as a duty gun. And Shooter 3 has limited experience with red dot-sighted pistols.<\/p>\n

Irons Vs. Red Dots: The Test<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Three drills were chosen. The first involved shooting three, five-shot groups\u2014slow fire\u2014from a sandbag rest at 10 yards using the red dot sight and the fixed sights.<\/p>\n

The second was the Step Back Drill, which required drawing from the holster and engaging an 8-inch steel plate with two shots at 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 yards, with each two-shot string timed separately. Par time for this drill is less than 20 seconds when the times for all five stages are added.<\/p>\n

\"irons\"irons
Tests 2 and 3 were all conducted from the Galco Yaqui Slide holster.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The final test was similar to half of the common El Prez Drill. The shooter started holstered and engaged three steel silhouette targets with two shots each from 15 yards. The guidance for each shooter on drills two and three was to shoot only as fast as you felt you could hit with every shot.<\/p>\n

Test 1: Precision<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\"wilson\"wilson
To really experience the shooting advantages a red dot sight can provide, you need to extend the distance to\u2014or reduce the size of\u2014the target.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

This test was designed to see which sights system could be used to deliver the most precision on target, and the results here were not surprising. Groups fired with the red dot sight were substantially smaller, on average by 39 percent. Additionally, Shooter 1 and Shooter 2 shot so similarly with both sights systems; Shooter 3 did not conduct this test. The performance gap here was substantially in favor of the red dot sight. However, it should be noted that the five-shot groups at 10 yards, still averaging less than an inch that were fired with fixed sights, demonstrate more than necessary precision for any self-defense handgun.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Precision (10 Yards)<\/strong><\/td>\nFixed Sights<\/strong><\/td>\nRed Dot Sight<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Group 1 (Avg.)<\/td>\n0.91<\/td>\n0.49<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Group 2 (Avg.)<\/td>\n0.97<\/td>\n0.56<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Group 3 (Avg.)<\/td>\n0.84<\/td>\n0.60<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Average:<\/strong><\/td>\n0.91<\/td>\n0.55<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n

Test 2: Step Back Drill<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\"irons\"irons
For the testing, a Trijicon RMR HD 2 with a 3.25 MOA dot was used by all three shooters.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

With this test, the waters began to cloud. All three shooters obtained hits with the fixed sights faster than with the red dot sight, on average by almost 14 percent. Surprisingly, at 20 yards, Shooter 2 and Shooter 3 were faster with the fixed sights. As expected, at 25 yards all three shooters were faster with the red dot sight by almost 20 percent. However, when the overall times to complete all five stages was compared, fixed sights proved to be about 2 percent faster. The average time for each drill with the red dot sight was 3.31 seconds, and the average time with the fixed sight was 3.25 seconds. The fixed sights were faster up close, and the red dot sight was faster at maximum distance, but when all five distances were considered, it was realistically a tie.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Step Back Drill (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 Yards)<\/strong><\/td>\nFixed Sights<\/strong><\/td>\nRed Dot Sight<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5 Yards<\/td>\n1.75<\/td>\n2.01<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10 Yards<\/td>\n2.40<\/td>\n2.59<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15 Yards<\/td>\n3.02<\/td>\n3.85<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20 Yards<\/td>\n4.19<\/td>\n4.14<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
25 Yards<\/td>\n4.91<\/td>\n3.98<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Average:<\/strong><\/td>\n3.25<\/td>\n3.31<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total:<\/strong><\/td>\n16.26<\/td>\n16.56<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n

Test 3: Multi-Target Drill<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\"wilson\"wilson
On the multiple target drill, every shooter performed better in every way with the fixed sights.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Where Test 2 required a measured balance of speed and accuracy, Test 3 was less demanding from an accuracy standpoint. Hitting a silhouette-sized target at 15 yards is not difficult. By the numbers, all three shooters shot faster with the fixed sights than they did with the red dot sight. The fixed sights won the drill by about 9\/10ths of a second. Split times between shots on the same target were 4 percent faster with the fixed sights, and transition times between targets were 5 percent faster with the fixed sights. The fixed sights were even faster out of the holster for the first shot by\u2014on average\u2014a quarter second or 13 percent.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Multi-Target Drill (15 Yards)<\/strong><\/td>\nFixed Sights<\/strong><\/td>\nRed Dot Sight<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1st Shot<\/td>\n1.85<\/td>\n2.14<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2nd Shot<\/td>\n2.18<\/td>\n2.61<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3rd Shot<\/td>\n2.84<\/td>\n3.34<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4th Shot<\/td>\n3.10<\/td>\n3.73<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5th Shot<\/td>\n3.64<\/td>\n4.47<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6th Shot<\/td>\n3.91<\/td>\n4.80<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Average Split Time:<\/strong><\/td>\n0.46<\/td>\n0.61<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Average Target Transition Time:<\/strong><\/td>\n0.60<\/td>\n0.74<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Average Total Time:<\/strong><\/td>\n3.91<\/td>\n4.80<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n

Lessons Learned<\/strong><\/h2>\n

What I can tell you, with some degree of confidence, is that you can make more accurate shots with a red dot sight than you can with a fixed sighted pistol at any distance. Also, if you\u2019re capable of performing the drills in Test 2 and Test 3 to standard with any pistol, you can probably perform them the same, if not faster, with a pistol that has fixed sights. This, of course, goes against the common narrative that red dot sights are better for concealed carry. Fixed sights performed the same or better during these two tests and do not have the failure potential of red dot sights.<\/p>\n

However, I think there are exceptions. If you\u2019re an extremely high-level competitive shooter who only\u2014or mostly\u2014uses a red dot sight, and who conducts hours of frequent practice with a red dot-sighted pistol, I\u2019m confident you can shoot a red dot-sighted pistol more accurately and faster, especially as distances increase. Also, anecdotally, I can tell you that new shooters respond to red dot sights better than fixed sights. I\u2019ve proven this numerous times working with new shooters to include my two daughters. Learning how to manage a trigger press and keep three planes of focus in tune with fixed sights is difficult.<\/p>\n

So, Do You Do the Dot?<\/strong><\/h2>\n

I still believe, as I predicted in my book, that dot-sighted handguns are the future and will lead to better and faster shooting. However, based on this experiment, what I\u2019ve witnessed with other shooters and what I\u2019ve learned from other instructors, I don\u2019t think the future is here just yet. Granted, this was a very limited test, and there are a lot of variables left to be examined, like the best dot size, color and brightness for speed, and the best window size and shape for target acquisition. Maybe more importantly, for the red dot sight to commonly outperform fixed sights at realistic self-defense distances, we might have to progress to a generation raised on dots and not fixed sights.<\/p>\n

\"irons\"irons<\/figure>\n

I shoot dot-sighted pistols about as much as I shoot fixed-sighted pistols. At realistic self-defense distances, and in practical scenarios, I shoot fixed sights better. But, if I had to make a precise shot at 25 yards and beyond, I\u2019d damned sure want a red dot sight. The results of this test and the potential failure possibilities with a red dot sight further support my decision to not use them on carry guns.<\/p>\n

However, I\u2019m not trying to convince you to do the same.<\/p>\n

What I hope this article does do is convince you to conduct your own testing. You might come to the same conclusion, realize you need more practice with a dot or fixed sights, or discover the red dot sight works better for you all the time.<\/p>\n

Mostly, I hope you don\u2019t just drink the Kool-Aid, because doing what all the cool kids are doing should not be the deciding factor in your weapon platform.<\/p>\n

Gun Notes: Wilson Combat eXperior Elite<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The eXperior Elite pistol from Wilson Combat is their newest and arguably best rendition of their X9 platform. It was the perfect pistol for this test; when a red dot sight is mounted, there is no provision\u2014without aftermarket accessories\u2014for co-witness fixed sights. This is because Wilson Combat uses the same slide cut and pin mounting system on the eXperior Elite that they developed for their Division 77 P1 pistol. This prevented the shooters from cheating either way.<\/p>\n

\"wilson\"wilson
The P1 optics sights pin system on the Wilson Combat eXperior Elite pistol provided the perfect testing platform with a reflex sight and fixed sights.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Additionally, being a brand-new pistol, none of the shooters had any prior experience with it. Also\u2014though unrelated to the experiment\u2014it\u2019s worth noting the extreme level of precision this pistol delivered, which is undeniably a product of its new double locking lugs. And finally, there were no stoppages of any sort experienced by any shooter during this experiment. The eXperior Elite pistol is available now from Wilson Combat with a base price of $3,999.<\/p>\n

Editor\u2019s Note:<\/strong>\u00a0This article originally appeared in the July 2026 issue of\u00a0Gun Digest the Magazine<\/a><\/em>.<\/p>\n\n

More On Pistol Red Dots<\/strong><\/h3>\n
  • The\u00a0Red Dot<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0Advantage<\/li>\n
  • The Best\u00a0Optics For CCW<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n
  • The Rising Trend Of Pistol Red Dots<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n
  • Long-Range Pistol Shooting<\/a><\/strong> With Red Dots<\/li>\n
  • Pistol Red Dot Footprints<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n
    \n
    \"44-Targetposters-pack-GD-reduced-300\"\"44-Targetposters-pack-GD-reduced-300\"<\/p>\n

    Next Step: Get your FREE Printable Target Pack<\/h2>\n

    Enhance your shooting precision with our 62 MOA Targets, perfect for rifles and handguns. Crafted in collaboration with Storm Tactical for accuracy and versatility.<\/p>\n

    Subscribe to the Gun Digest email newsletter<\/strong> and get your downloadable target pack sent straight to your inbox. Stay updated with the latest firearms info in the industry.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n